Calculating Digital Signage ROI: The Ground Rules
Author: Bill Gerba on 2005-03-16 23:55:33
Given the obvious benefits and proven returns of in-store marketing and
POP advertising displays, a large portion of the digital signage industry is
perpetually trying to up the ante by offering dynamic signage to retailers and in-store merchandisers. From new digital signage start-ups to old POP
display manufacturers, everybody is looking for the next big thing that will increase revenues and improve customer satisfaction on the sales floor.
Whether or not digital signage will be the next big thing still remains to be seen, as a number of challenges must be overcome before the medium is
widely accepted by retailers and marketers alike. Of these, the most important (and perhaps the most difficult) is determining the return on
investment of the digital signage network. Without a quick and easy way to calculate ROI, no amount of flash and sparkle is going to save our beloved
plasma screens and networked media players from the scrap heap.
Because there are so many different business models that a
digital
signage network owner could subscribe to, it would be impossible for me to cover all of the different ways to calculate ROI. So instead, I'm going
to focus on techniques for coaxing the number out of the most common kind of network: ad-driven or ad-supported retail networks. I'm also going to
avoid
interactive kiosks and interactive signage that have more obvious,
feedback-driven methods for deriving ROI numbers for now (these will be the subject of another article). In this, the first in a series of articles
covering the basics of calculating digital signage ROI metrics, I'm going to start by introducing a couple of concepts to get you in the right mindset
for determining your signage network's return on investment. In subsequent articles, I will try to provide some ideas and methodologies for
accumulating and analyzing your data to come up with the magic number. So, without further ado, let's get started.
First, Know Thy Metric
Do you know what you're going to try and measure? Ok, the obvious answer here is "how much did we lift sales?" But depending the focus of your
project, how tightly integrated it is with the rest of the store/product/brand marketing, and the size of your data set, you might be trying to measure
one of several different things. To explain, I'd like to introduce a little diagram called the retail marketing funnel:
/ \
/ \ <- SALES
/_____\
/ \ <- IDENTIFICATION
/_________\
/ \ <- PREFERENCE
/_____________\
/ \ <- PERCEPTION
/_________________\
/ \ <- RECALL
/_____________________\
/ \ <- RECOGNITION
/_________________________\
/ \ <- AWARENESS
/_____________________________\
There are probably a hundred variations on this diagram (which I think everybody has seen in Marketing 101), but I'd like to do a quick overview of
what
I believe each of these stages to mean:
Awareness is simply the cognizance that a brand or product exists. Awareness marketing targets the largest groups of people, and simply strives
to "get the brand name out there," wherever "there" may be.
Recognition is the stage where a consumer can mentally link a brand to a product or marketing slogan. Many marketers like to correlate
recognition numbers with sales numbers, so there's a lot of recognition data out there.
Recall, the next stage of the funnel, tests the opposite of recognition: given a particular product, can the consumer remember the particular
brand image or redeeming qualities of the product? Most TV commercials for consumer products strive to make it to the recall stage, but in reality,
they're typically relegated to recognition or awareness status.
The
perception stage relates to how a brand or product is generally received and comprehended by consumers. The notion of "positive" or
"negative" brand image and equity commonly comes from marketing efforts at this level.
The
preference stage is the first funnel stage where marketing has solidly influenced the customer's beliefs. This level of marketing promotes
specific features and benefits of the brand or product (often at the expense of competing products) to try and become the customer's brand of
choice.
Identification, in this case, is literally the point at which the consumer visualizes him or herself as a user of the brand or product.
Marketing at this level will often involve showing the brand or product being used by a particular class of individual that (hopefully) the target
consumer will be able to identify with and relate to, thus creating a bond between consumer and product, and motivating the sale.
And last, but not least, is the
sales stage itself. This is the point where the customer makes their active purchase decision, whether that
means choosing between brands, or deciding whether to make the purchase at all.
The funnel shape is used for a couple of reasons. For one, it shows how you can pump a ton of resources into brand awareness campaigns but only see
minimal sales increases. Also, it demonstrates how you often have to walk a shopper through all of the funnel's stages before converting him into a
buyer. However, if we look at the diagram as a pyramid instead of a funnel, it suggests that increased sales can only be built on top of a foundation
that includes brand awareness, recognition, recall, and so on.
Now that's not to say that every advertising tactic needs to focus on every stage of the funnel. In fact, quite the opposite is true, since an ad
campaign that tries to do everything probably isn't going to do
anything particularly well. Let's think about a retail digital signage network
(perhaps an
in-store TV network) in this
context. A
retail digital signage network is probably going to be most effective between the
awareness and perception stages, although there are certainly cases where it could influence perception and preference as well. As a customer moves
down the aisles of a grocery store, for example, he is already primed to make purchases. A typical grocery store aisle might contain 1,000 different
products, and unless your product is the one the customer has come to buy, it's probably not receiving much attention from him. However, if the
customer happens to pass a digital sign displaying an ad for your product as he walked through the store, he is now mentally primed with your product's
image, and is more likely to notice it during his walk down the aisle. In fact, according to a
recent study by Arbitron (and sponsored by digital signage provider CoolSign),
"having the [digital signage network] in a mall seemed to raise the average recall for an advertiser by 18 percentage points." On the other hand, if
your network is narrowcasting long-form content in a captive audience network, the priming effect isn't really in play, since your audience won't be able to buy the advertised product immediately. In these cases, your network's content will probably serve to better improve awareness and recognition.
When trying to decide which stage of the funnel you want to improve with your digital signage deployment, think about the immediate goal of the system.
For example, do you want to:
- Drive more traffic into your store from outside
- Drive traffic to specific locations within your store
- Encourage "up-sells" to higher margin products
- Encourage cross sales of complementary products
- Improve awareness of a particular brand, service offering or product line
Each of these goals targets a different stage of the sales funnel. So the goal of your network is going to determine the method and metrics that help
you determine your ROI.
I'm going to stop here for now, but I'll pick up soon with the next installment of this article:
Understanding the Limits of your Data.
Subscribe to comments for this article
|
Trackback
Digg this!
|
Del.icio.us
Previous Article: Web-Enabled ATMs: What Could Possibly go Wrong?Next Article: What does Clarity's Acquisition of CoolSign Software Mean for the Digital Signage Industry?
Front page of Digital Signage Insider Blog
LEGAL STUFF: The Digital Signage Insider is written by multiple authors. The author of each article is clearly identified at the start of the article. The opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official opinions of WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All articles are copyright © 2004-2009 by their respective author. All content besides the actual article text, e.g. surrounding branding and informational content, is copyright © 2000-2009 WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as provided in WireSpring's
Republishing and Syndication Policy, no articles may be reproduced, in whole or in part, without WireSpring's express written consent.