Voting Kiosks and Super Tuesday
Author: Bill Gerba on 2004-03-04 02:24:00
 |
 |
| Get a custom quote
for your LARGE network project |
| |
 |
 |
| Get a custom quote for your SMALL network project |
Recently, a lot of attention has been given to
Diebold, a Canadian manufacturer of POS and self-service devices, among the most
notorious of which are their
E-voting kiosks. Diebold has been working with local, state, and federal government entities to try and standardize all electronic voting on their hardware/software platform (for an understanding of what a kiosk software platform is, I invite you to look at
FireCast software from
WireSpring). However, the system has been
plagued with
problems, and despite lawsuits,
inquiries, and a tremendous amount of
bad press, for some reason people
continue to test and deploy these systems for voting throughout the United States. The problem, from my perspective, is not the fact that these machines are expensive, complicated, difficult to set up, and unreliable (all of which are true), but that there are massive security problems, many of which have actually been acknowledged by Diebold employees (or former employees, as the case may be). This past Tuesday was "Super Tuesday," when several states held their primary elections, and a number of them (including Maryland) introduced Diebold voting machines to do the job. Despite
smooth sailing for the most part, there are
those people who still doubt that voting kiosks are a wise choice, especially when contracted from a single vendor. While I applaud the use of self-service technology in any situation where it will make things faster, easier and more efficient, I have to agree that the notion of having one company (a non-U.S. company, to boot) in control of a huge number of ballots is far from comforting. Add to that the fact that the selected company has based its software on an
insecure platform, making poor (or no) use of encryption and other security measures, and you have a recipe for disaster. This problem needs to be addressed and solved before every locale adopts E-voting. While the opportunity for a faster, more efficient voting process is certainly appealing, we all need to take into consideration the potential pitfalls of adopting such a system before it is ready.
Subscribe to comments for this article
|
Trackback
Previous Article: More from the world of search enginesNext Article: More good news for Linux... maybe
Front page of Digital Signage Insider Blog
LEGAL STUFF: The Digital Signage Insider is written by multiple authors. The author of each article is clearly identified at the start of the article. The opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official opinions of WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All articles are copyright © 2004-2012 by their respective author. All content besides the actual article text, e.g. surrounding branding and informational content, is copyright © 2000-2012 WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as provided in WireSpring's
Republishing and Syndication Policy, no articles may be reproduced, in whole or in part, without WireSpring's express written consent.