The Digital Signage Insider

Digital Signage Screen Placement: Targeting the Attention Zone

Published on: 2009-12-17

As an industry, we have always struggled with the seemingly basic question of where to place our screens. I've lost count of the number of people that I've consulted with over the years who wanted to know the "best" places to put their displays. That's a noble goal to be sure, especially when tackled before the screens have been deployed, found to not work, and are in danger of being scrapped. Unfortunately, we still run into plenty of situations where the host venues aren't as cooperative as we'd like, and we're forced to make changes to our "best possible placement" plan to account for the realities of retail fixtures, shelf space, and store traffic patterns. While we've written a bit about all of these things in the past, I thought I'd share a few more of our analysis techniques today. That way, when you're out there planning your next deployment (and you don't decide to call us to ask for help), you'll have a few more resources at your disposal.

Where people look





If you've been reading this blog for a while or happened to drop in on my presentation at the Digital Signage Expo last year, you may have already seen the first two charts above. They appeared in our series on Digital Signage Screen Placement, which you can peruse using the handy links below: In the article about angle, height and text size, we examined the field of view that a typical person of normal vision has, and how large the field of view becomes over typical in-store distances. Specifically, we found that a typical shopper walking the "power aisle" of a store moves about 20 feet in 5-7 seconds. To maximize the number of viewers that might encounter a screen, many networks have opted to raise their screens up high. But as we discussed in that article, this actually decreases the amount of time that a screen can appear in a viewer's active attention zone. Honest Abe can help explain that one:



The first thing you'll notice is that when somebody looks straight ahead, they don't really get an even view of what's above and below their direct line-of-sight. That's because our eyes have a wider field of view below the level plane -- we see about 75 degrees below level, but only about 60 degrees above. Consequently, the 20-or-so degree active attention zone is pitched slightly downwards too. Translation: the further up your screens are from the ground, the more likely they are to be outside of the active attention zone for your viewers. Left-to-right, the zone of active attention is actually a bit larger, since humans have a nearly 180 degree field of view, with about of third of that in full, binocular stereo. The active attention area is about half of the stereo area, or about 30 degrees laterally.

What people see

With these two numbers in mind, the next thing to think about is how your screens will appear to the viewer. Since we tend to prioritize the things we pay attention to based on basic criteria like motion, size, color and shape, manipulating those variables can have a significant impact on how and when your screens are noticed, and for how long. Remember, the screens themselves are going to be static: you can only move the content on your screens, not the screens themselves. So in virtually every case, size is going to be the primary determining factor in how your screens are perceived. The basic issue here is that the angular size of an object decreases as it moves further away from you. (Fancy terminology: the angle subtended by an object is the width of that object divided by its distance away from you.) Thus, if you were using 40" screens (which are about 35" wide and about 20" high), and wanted to make sure that they were going to be in the active attention zone (say 10 degrees above or below the level plane, and within 15 degrees of center laterally), you might derive a table like this:

Distance between viewer and screen Vertical % of attention zone occupied Horizontal % of attention zone occupied Total % of attention zone occupied
5 feet 91.6% 100% 91.6%
10 feet 45.8% 50.5% 23.1%
15 feet 30.5% 33.7% 10.3%
20 feet 22.3% 25.3% 5.8%

As you can see, even moving a small distance away from the screen means that people will have many new items thrust into their field of active attention. At 20 feet away, your viewers will have about 17 other visual areas competing for attention. Even if your screen is by far the most interesting (and it might be, considering that the other items in the viewer's field will be things like ceiling tiles, rafters, etc.), that's still a lot of competition to get past. Similarly, because the amount of area one can perceive in the active attention zone gets so big, so fast, using much larger screens (e.g. going from a 40" to a 50") doesn't help much.

How to get people to look at your screen and see your message

Why do so many digital signs underperform in the field? Based on the calculations above, the screens are simply too far away from the target viewers. There are three ways to solve this problem:
  1. Use really big screens. Giant screens can occupy a larger portion of the active attention zone for a longer period of time. Plus, they have novelty value. But they're expensive.

  2. Use regular-size screens, but put them right in front of the viewer. This will work in lobbies and waiting rooms where movement is constrained, but you'll probably have a hard time convincing your grocery store hosts to put screens on top of stands in their power aisles, or place them on their endcaps (even though they'd arguably work the best there).

  3. Guess where attention will be focused, and place screens strategically. If your host won't give up 700 square inches of endcap space for a 40" screen, ask for 300 and use a smaller screen. If you know a particular endcap performs well (based on sales data, traffic pattern analysis, etc.), that might be a worthy tradeoff, because you're essentially increasing the probability of your screen falling inside of the viewer's active attention zone.
  Ultimately, the willingness of your host venue -- whether it's a hotel, retailer, break room or otherwise -- to accommodate the ideal installation of your screens rests on their own ability to calculate a positive return on investment from those screens. If your venues don't stand to gain anything, you're not going to convince them to give you better placement. But if they win when you win, hopefully they'll be more willing to work with you and your data-driven analysis.

What's the most effective digital sign placement that you've seen? Was there a setup that made you or the viewer sit up and take notice? Leave a comment below and let us know!


Comments   

0 John Moezzi 2009-12-17 15:27
Well prepared and written, Bill. This is very helpful.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 Bill Gerba 2009-12-17 18:56
Thanks, John. Glad to hear it helps. -Bill
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 Dave Haynes 2009-12-21 17:44
Good work, as always, Bill. However, I don't understand the use of a hedgehog for your demo of horizontal field of view. Hedgehogs have really crappy eyesight. Happy holidays Haynes
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 Bill Gerba 2009-12-24 19:59
You know, I probably spent a good half hour trying to Google Image Search for a top-down view of somebody's head (note: keep Safe Search TURNED ON when doing that kind of search!). To no avail. And my graphic artists were gone for the day. So while I don't feel the need to justify my efforts (to you of all people), your so-called hedgehog is, in fact, my top-down Lincoln :) Cheers, Bill
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 digitalsignageblog 2010-05-02 12:09
Hi bill, I just read this after you've left a comment on one of our blog posts and found it very informative. I just want to add how important it is to place your screen in a suitable environment to attract the attention of viewers i.e. having a the screen hanging in the middle of a the store vs the screen camouflaged against the wall. I've seen so many businesses place screen in locations that the viewer can't even see and can't work out how they came to that decision! My guess is that most businesses want to save money and do not want to install power points (Average cost of installing a power point in Australia is about $340 depending on location). They basically end up installing screens where a power point is available - go figure. Once again, great post!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 Marie 2011-03-28 14:08
Thanks for the timely post! We are expanding and remodeling our pharmacy and this has been discussed recently. Appreciate your insight.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 Kimmo Sainio 2011-03-29 11:25
Great post! Bill, do you have any insight of how much you can enhance the attention by using directional audio together with screens? Harris is showcasing such in their website for 7 Eleven TV and I just wander if that in fact is THE solution for grabbing attention. Cheers, Kimmo
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote

Add comment


Subscribe to the Digital Signage Insider RSS feed


Looking for more articles and research? Our newest articles can always be found at Digital Signage Insider, but there are hundreds of additional research articles in our historical articles archive.


You may also be interested in M2M Insider: our blog about M2M and the Internet of Things.


Questions?  Get pricing  •  Call us at (800) 989-9269 or +1 (954) 548-3300  •  Chat with us online
Copyright © 2016 WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. View our site map, privacy and legal info, and syndication policy.