The Digital Signage Insider

DOOH Advertising is Dead. Long Live DOOH Advertising!

Published on: 2012-06-07

When we first noticed that SeeSaw Networks' website had gone dark a few months ago, many took it as a sign that advertising-funded DOOH networks were not long for this world. I'm not sure why someone would use a digital signage network aggregator as a bellwether for the digital out-of-home industry at large, but I have to admit that if you did, things would look rather dire. In fact, during those same few months, another longtime DOOH aggregator has died in all but name, and the latest quarterly financials for yet another aggregator make for pretty scary reading. But so what? The failure of the DOOH aggregator market doesn't have anything to do with those folks actually building and running ad-funded networks, does it?

Are aggregators long for this world? What about DOOH advertising networks in general?

Ask anyone in the business of selling ads on digital signs and they'll tell you that more often than not, it's an uphill battle. Audiences are too small, the few established metrics are incompatible with traditional planning tools and media buys are either too big for small advertisers or too small for big ones. What's more, unlike TV or Internet, DOOH advertising isn't a "must have" for anyone. And unlike mobile, it doesn't guarantee the same kind of direct, 1:1 connection that marketers love (even though they usually don't properly utilize it).

Now imagine that you have all of those problems and you then ask somebody else to do the selling for you -- because that's precisely how a lot of network-aggregator relationships look to outsiders. Unfortunately, without the accountability that comes with owning and operating the screens, aggregators have a hard time speaking to potential buyers with authority. Consequently, their guarantees can look iffy and can be literally unverifiable at times. That might cut the mustard for print and TV ads (where decades of unverifiability have somehow quelled advertiser fears), but for new media it makes for a very difficult pitch.

Short answer: Yes with a "but". Long answer: No with an "if".

You can see how the aggregators might have a hard time doing their jobs. However, remove their special challenges from the paragraphs above and things still don't look so rosy for those who own and operate purely advertising-driven networks, either. The simple fact is that the problems we were dealing with 5 -- even 10 -- years ago remain virtually untouched today. Couple that with the impossible fickleness of ad agencies and the plethora of low-cost, high-value marketing options available to small advertisers, and few (aside from the network owners, of course) have the incentive or motivation to try and solve the issues at hand.

In the past, we've offered up a few tips that customers have passed along to us about selling advertising on digital signs. But nothing is going to help a network that doesn't have a solid value proposition -- and an even more solid sales team -- in place. And even then, it's easy to get blindsided by the paradox where better spots can be harder to sell. That said, there is some good news. For example, as the cost of owning and operating a network continues to decrease, fewer ads have to be sold to break even. Also, well-funded networks can capitalize on the misfortunes of struggling networks to solve the problem of front-loaded scale. Still, aside from those networks and screens that are tied more closely to some sort of merchandising function, I predict things will get worse for pure-play DOOH network owners before they get better.

What does this mean for the digital signage industry in general?

Since at least 2007, digital signage deployments for non-advertising uses have outpaced advertising deployments by a rate of about 1.5 to 1. (I believe that number originally came from PQ Media, although I don't have the link handy.) So if we do some quick and dirty math based on our own digital signage pricing guide (which we recently extrapolated against industry size data from IMS), we see that over 800,000 screens have been deployed in the US over the last four years -- at an increasing pace, no less. Of those, we can then assume that almost 490,000 were installed for some purpose not primarily tied to advertising, whether it be corporate communications, wayfinding, merchandising, or something else entirely.

In short, even if DOOH advertising networks do face a period of decline that's foreshadowed by the difficulties of their aggregator cousins, there is sufficient growth elsewhere to bolster the overall market against it. And if you're a vendor, it's a great reason to look into diversifying your customer base.


0 # Adam Malone 2012-06-07 16:53
Bill, Appreciate the commentary and analysis. We need not go further than Econ 101 to weigh the cost of deployment and operations vs the expected revenues over the lifetime of the network. In my experience, the companies that employ the "if we build it, they will come" model for growth quickly find themselves in the hardware sales business (if you know what I mean). The problem for aggregators or DOOH sales agents alike is not one of scale, venue, or audience composition (et al), rather there has yet to be a demonstrable need and want for consumers to interact with the DOOH content. If the consumer doesn't see the value in looking, then the advertisers aren't going to clamor to be there. Scale or no scale. Discount of no discount. We are finding at DOmedia that the "value" question needs to be solved before the efficiency question is even valid. Once we as an industry can clearly articulate the value of the content and customer experience with DOOH, then tools and platforms that allow agencies and brands to BUY easily and at-scale will flourish - along with the networks that compose them. AM, DOmedia
+1 # John DOOH 2012-06-08 14:53
Bill, The unvarnished truth has finally come out! For many this will be a very disappointing disclosure. For just may save them a lot of pain and agony. John DOOH Drive Media Networks
0 # Bill Gerba 2012-06-08 15:16
Adam: I don't 100% agree with your statement "If the consumer doesn't see the value in looking, then the advertisers aren't going to clamor to be there." I understand what you're trying to say, but from a pure economic perspective you're backwards: if *advertisers* don't see the value in supplying the ads, there won't be any funds available to power the DOOH network in the first place. Yes, showing compelling content in order to get people to pay attention is important. But a lot of advertisers make their decision before that gets factored in, and I think that's where the industry is faltering right now. John DOOH: It's going to happen eventually, but maybe not in its current incarnation. The big question is, what must change? I think it might be the ownership of the assets, first and foremost.
0 # Robert Polanski 2012-06-08 17:16
Have a a lot of trouble with your analysis of DOOH. The jury is still out. It represents an important meaningful, value added(effective/cost efficient) "feet on the ground" for both social and shopper marketing marketeers today both CPG and retail. Someone will do it with proper positioning and understanding of the environment today. Enough.
0 # Bill Gerba 2012-06-12 19:11
Hi Robert, I appreciate your position, but the jury has been out on DOOH for a long, long time. I think the the vast majority of currently-accepted wisdom about DOOH business models is flat-out wrong. While out-of-home advertising on digital screens will probably survive and even thrive in the future, I just don't see how business-wise it can possibly look anything like it does today.

Subscribe to the Digital Signage Insider RSS feed

Looking for more articles and research? Our newest articles can always be found at Digital Signage Insider, but there are hundreds of additional research articles in our historical articles archive.

You may also be interested in M2M Insider: our blog about M2M and the Internet of Things.