For about a year now, I've been giving a presentation at trade shows and conferences called "The top 5 reasons why digital signage networks fail." I've covered this topic in various blog articles, so none of the reasons should come as much of a surprise. Still, without fail, people come up to me after I've given the talk and ask, "Are you really sure that those are the reasons?" Typically, that's followed by an explanation of their new startup business model and their defenses for why they won't succumb to any of the aforementioned problems, despite already exhibiting a number of the common warning signs. Over the months, I've refined my analysis and put more things on our list of DOs and DON'Ts, but the five reasons we've looked at continue to accurately predict failures. (I'll let you know when we figure out the factors that can predict successes). So, it was with much interest that I picked up a white paper written by Chris McIntyre-Brown of Futuresource Consulting, who came up with his own list by studying about 100 digital signage networks in Europe. While Chris and I agree on a number of points, there are some interesting differences that I can't reconcile.

Futuresource: Less than half of digital signage networks are successful

The Futuresource report (PDF format) looked at 100 digital screen networks in various European countries in order to "understand more of the intangible issues surrounding [the industry's] development." Their overall finding was that, "of almost 100 projects evaluated in depth by Futuresource during the research, 9 failed completely to meet any of the objectives set and 10 were deemed to be only partial successes. Add to that the fact that for a significant proportion it was too early to judge success, the risk of potential failure was high." Later in the report, they clarify what happened to the rest of the networks: "Although 40 of the projects evaluated were considered successful, for a further 30 it was deemed too early to determine the level of success." While it may not be fair to assume that all of those final 30 networks are in danger of imminent failure, WireSpring's own data suggests it wouldn't be much of a surprise if they were (more on that in a minute). Futuresource goes on to propose these five points as the most common reasons for early network death:
  1. A lack of clear ROI modeling
  2. The lack of advertising proof points (metrics)
  3. Too much network fragmentation and not enough scalability
  4. Project complexity
  5. Little understanding of content requirements
To counter these problems, Futuresource suggests the following remedies:
  • Engage Top Management but ensure key checks and balances are in place and key stakeholders are on board
  • Encourage Finance Department involvement
  • Embrace the complex approval process
  • Set objectives
  • Set non-financial as well as financial objectives
  • Budget for the cost of measurement
  • Build in content experimentation
  • Understand the full roll out cost implications
  • Commit resources to adding / developing internal understanding
  • Recognize that advertising rates are related to value for the advertiser
  • Plan in detail and then plan again
WireSpring: Ad-funded network + Lack of ad sales experience = Early network death

I'm sure regular readers of this blog will find a number of Futuresource's suggestions to be pretty familiar. We've been encouraging companies to engage in shopper marketing experiments, budget for both upfront and ongoing network costs, expect and learn to navigate project complexity, and set goals with measurable milestones. As I wrote last November, we looked at 6,000 inquiries that WireSpring received over a 4 1/2 year period to determine what caused so many networks to fail. Based on this data, our '5 crucial steps that can make or break your digital signage project' turned out to be:
  1. Know your business model
  2. Understand your goals
  3. Build a solid team
  4. Avoid common pitfalls
  5. Learn from past mistakes
While content strategy, measurement and network "fragmentation" (the remaining items on Futuresource's list) are all important, many companies encounter such severe problems at the outset that they rarely get to the point where they have to worry about these more advanced concerns.

And of course, I couldn't write an article like this without mentioning my favorite (internally-generated) statistic: if you don't have experience selling advertising and you plan on deploying an ad-funded network, you're going to fail. How sure am I of that? Oh, about 96% sure, based on a final sample of 631 networks. I've said it before and I'll say it again: if you're thinking of starting a network whose primary revenue stream comes from showing advertisements, the number one thing you can do to improve your odds of success is to hire an experienced ad sales team, partner with one, or outsource that side of the operation to a competent organization.

Are we focusing too much on advertising?

One final thought upon reading Futuresource's research. They suggest that "[while] other models are equally valid, and quite often the most interesting, it is the advertising model that will really drive the development of digital signage." I don't agree with this, and neither does Frost & Sullivan. According to Frost's 2007 research, deployments of non-advertising displays are outpacing those of advertising units at the rate of 1.5 to 1, and their current installed base is nearly twice as large. Still, ad-funded networks get the lion's share of attention in the media and have captured the imaginations of entrepreneurs and Fortune 500 companies alike, so I can understand why it might seem like they'll be shaping the industry in the future. But with all the unique and innovative non-advertising applications that I've seen, I find it hard to believe that advertising-based networks will be as dominant as people think.

Do you have any crucial DOs and DON'Ts to add to the list above? Leave a comment below to share your thoughts.


+1 # Larry Blaney 2008-07-11 14:35
Bill, I agree with your assessments. Basically it comes down to common sense fundamentals. A movie can have great action, special effects, but if the story(writing) is poor, it will never meet expectations and leave the viewer wanting more. Digital Signage is not about the newest display or player platform, it has to be about accomplishing the required goal/objective and most of the time, which has to do with content. 2D digital signage has become irrelevant due to repurposing media assets rather than recreating target messaging to meet goals. Time is well spent defining the goals and objectives of the project and then spend the rest of the time developing the content. The technology piece is rather insignificant in the design of a successful signage project.
0 # Laura Davis-Taylor 2008-07-11 19:41
Great points as always Bill. And I'd like to add my support against advertising-based networks being the chosen leaders in this industry. I almost wish we'd stop using the word advertising in relation to digital signage and start thinking about it as communications--it seems that anything advertising is beginning to carry a somewhat negative impression and I hate to pigeon hole us with it. A point James Bickers made in the newest edition of Retail Customer Experience mag comes to mind. He was sharing that he took his 5 year old shopping at Wal-Mart and he said, "Daddy, how come there's TV but they only play commercials?" Touche.
0 # Gary Halpin 2008-07-13 16:26
Completely agree with Larry and Laura's comments. I've always talked about the two most important elements (IMHO) for a network. The content and the merchandising of the network. I think almost everyone (or almost everyone) these days understands that If the monitors are 20 feet above people's heads, or the network tries to encompass a huge footprint, then they're going to have a tough time. But I'd like to comment on the content part a bit. Great content is a process, which starts with a creative strategy, then conceptualizing ideas on that strategy, which should involve a lot of brainstorming and vital feedback before moving to the execution phase of producing the end content. I've seen some of these vitals parts skipped, with a rush to go right to the execution, and again, IMHO, this spells trouble. Let me put it this way. Would a company spend $3-5M on an ad campaign by just cutting a :30 for air without completely understanding their target market, developing a specific strategy, hearing different concepts, or seeing scripts & storyboards?
0 # mary anne fleisher 2008-07-25 11:59
I totally disagree. If you think radio, tv and newspapers are going to give up on local advertising, think again. They will reclaim their footprint in their markets through digital sign networks. They already have sales staffs on the ground who know where the money is. Everyone wants the big cpg money. Local is so easy to get. Move over tech heads the media is coming.
0 # Bill Gerba 2008-07-25 14:27
Larry: Yup, totally agree. Even today there are networks out there running little more than reformatted TV clips and commercials. It doesn't work (in most situations), so why spend all that time and money building out the network if that's how you're going to use it? Doesn't make any sense to me. Fortunately, more people are avoiding this pitfall these days, and I continue to see a larger volume of high-quality digital signage content as I make my informal surveys around the country. Laura: Awesome anecdote ;) I heard recently that Wal-Mart is heavily investing in version 2.0 of Wal-Mart TV, so I hope (and expect) they'll start to remedy that particular problem and a number of others! Gary: I think you touch on an important point. Even today digital in-store media isn't considered along with all of the other media components of a major brand campaign, and that's a big problem. We seem to get stuck with the leftovers -- both in terms of creative and in terms of budget -- which makes it hard for lots of these networks to shine. Until digital in-store is put on a level playing field with TV, cable, internet, etc. (weighted by reach or whatever), that's not likely to change. Mary Anne: TV and radio are fighting back, though the results so far have been pretty anemic. Maybe if Google makes good on its threat/promise to somehow deliver targeted TV ads via cable boxes we might get more relevance out of the medium. However, it hasn't happened yet, and that means there's more in play for alternative out-of-home like digital signage.
0 # Daryl Abueva 2009-11-24 10:00
Im Daryl Abueva from the Philippines. Our company is into outdoor advertising since 1947. We are currently considering going into digital signage installations in supermarkets here all over the Philippines and our company will be the one selling the ads for the digital signage. I read the article and the comments above and I believe that our company is also facing the same issues here in the Philippines. Right now our company is selling the digital signage system (LCD screen, with server/client hardware and brackets with stand). But I am still looking for a supplier of server/client hardware because I am not satisfied with my current supplier. I would appreciate if anybody can recommend suppliers and if there's anyone here who can teach me more about software/hardware considerations.
+2 # 2010-06-03 20:57
I have to agree with mary anne fleisher; local media companies are looking for new ways to advertise and they've told me so in no uncertain terms. I also must agree with Bill Gerba; our first network failed because we were too early here in Milwaukeeville but fundamentally while our tech could hold its own we failed because we did not have experienced advertising sales person(s) to assist us.
0 # DigitalSignage 2010-07-26 16:00
I don't think digital signage projects fail. I think it is one of the best things to happen in modern times and i'm proud of the work my business does in this sector.
+2 # Edward 2010-08-18 09:35
I'm looking into building a small local digital signage network at one or two gas stations. I am planning on targeting local business's as the main advertisers given that gas stations are a prime location to reach local customers. I'm trying to decide how to best approach the potential advertisers though. The average reach for a gas station is 27,000 views per month. I think this form of advertising would be great for local business's because its cheap, local and a great way to build awareness in the target community? Any advice on getting started? and or creative ways to pitch to potential advertisers.
+2 # Mike Mehlmann 2012-05-03 17:35
If you are referring to advertising supported DOOH Networks, the reason they fail is that they are being run, and led, by owners and executives with inadequate experiences and backgrounds; specifically, retail, IT, creative, online, real estate, etc. The minute the network becomes ad supported, it becomes an Out-of-Home Media company....and I am not just talking about the sales function. I am talking about all the OOH Media Executive functions leading up to the sales execution including venue type, site selection, screen placement, content, venue contract negotiations, budgeting and forecasting, inventory and pricing and staffing. As such, the development of the business model needs to be led by non-traditional OOH media executives.
+1 # Edin Pasalic 2012-05-10 02:30
Another reason why advertising based networks fail is the size of the network. Media agencies don't really care about the network that has 100 screen(only if the reach is incredible) and selling to local advertisers has always been a hard task. Also DOOH is still a new medium for media planners and they hate to do extra work. They love to invest in old and "proven" mediums and it seems like you can't make a mistake or won't get fired if you invest in internet advertising. So I do believe that network that has better chance of succeeding needs to be large which requires big up font investment. I believe that Bill talked about that in one of his articles, how it is easier to get a faster ROI with larger network just because you don't require as many advertisers.
+2 # Tom Wabwire 2012-08-10 16:15
Surprised how pessimistic some people can be, failure is good. It does not mean you have lost, It means there is a learning opportunity. And if you take that positively chances you will do something right the next time round. Recall the inventor of the light bulb. How many did he have to break to get the right one to light up. Where would the world be if he had constant reminders about why bulbs do not light up? So please create a more positive and supportive blog and and your presentations to your self.

Subscribe to the Digital Signage Insider RSS feed

Looking for more articles and research? Our newest articles can always be found at Digital Signage Insider, but there are hundreds of additional research articles in our historical articles archive.

You may also be interested in M2M Insider: our blog about M2M and the Internet of Things.