<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel's Digital Signage Gambit and the Internet of Things</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel's Digital Signage Gambit and the Internet of Things</description>
		<link>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 23:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.wirespring.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bill Gerba says:</title>
			<link>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1564</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ken: I initially agreed with you. But after thinking about it, came to my new conclusion that lead to this blog article. To me, thinking that they could buy the assets of a 2nd-rate DS software company and use \\that\\ to boost the demand for Intel chips seems even more unlikely then using it for a strategic purpose like getting toe hold in the IoT market, especially since DS is one of the most compute-intensive IoT applications right now, and thus still a good fit for Intel-centric systems.
Lupe: Intel, just by virtue of being Intel, has already been inside the lion's share of DS solutions for the past decade-plus, so for them, even though the market is growing, there's nowhere to go but down. Hence their dilemma and odd posturing.
Angelica: Thanks so much for the kind words!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bill Gerba</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1564</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Angelica Pestrano says:</title>
			<link>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1563</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I love the term "enhanced interest". I think this is the best term that will describe digital signage. Your blog is very interesting and informative at the same time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Angelica Pestrano</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1563</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lupe Oneil says:</title>
			<link>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1562</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is always the possibility that Intel will not be the next best thing in the digital world. Many brands are actually stepping up and are very good, not to mention, competitive. Intel may not be worrying these days when they are still a giant but someday - if they won't start to make great innovations then they will be stripped down of their throne.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lupe Oneil</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1562</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ken Goldberg says:</title>
			<link>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bill:
Thanks for reading and mentioning my post, it is always nice to know it is read outside of my family! I get what you are saying, but it doesn't really jibe with Intel's previous "big" efforts related to digital out of home. Both the CognoVision deal and the OPS effort were arguably about creating greater demand for Intel chips. To think that entering the software space with recycled code is about something more strategic than either of those efforts seems contrived to me. It is clearly tactical, but we can agree to disagree. I think they may have misread the market space as well as their own place in it as an infrastructure provider. Cisco, anyone?
One thing we do agree upon is that there is no need to lose any sleep over their entry into the field.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ken Goldberg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wirespring.com/30-legacy-blog-digital-signage-insider/853-intel-s-digital-signage-gambit-and-the-internet-of-things#comment-1561</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
