Hardware, software and expert advice for digital signage and kiosks
 Home Products Solutions Blog Support Company News Contact
Customer Login 
Digital Signage Insider SignageWire
Latest Articles Full Article List

The Digital Signage Insider
WireSpring's blog featuring tips and analysis from a team of industry experts

Tesco's digital signage advertising network may be struggling

Author: Bill Gerba on 2006-01-07 00:02:23

Brand Republic is carrying a short article about Tesco TV, which many consider to be the premier digital signage installation in the UK.  More specifically, Brand Republic reports that Tesco TV isn't living up to its expectations, and is faltering over a lack of advertisers.  Obviously, Tesco and JCDecaux (the agency responsible for selling ads on the network) are both motivated to make it a success, as the former hopes to benefit from increased sales of advertised products, while the latter would like to increase the number of media placements it controls (and improve ad performance).  So it comes as something of a surprise that these two large, worldly companies might be having difficulties.

Ok, it's not exactly a surprise.  After all, AV Interactive hinted at the same concerns in a digital signage-oriented article last October, which I pointed out in a blog article on November 4th ("Are shoppers turned off by instore TV networks?").  But considering JCDecaux's considerable weight in the industry, something must be wrong with those installations if they're really having trouble selling the ads.  According to Brand Republic writer James Quilter:
The [Tesco TV] roll-out has stalled at 100 stores and no more screens have been installed in new large-format Tesco Extra stores.

According to insiders, the chain is considering taking the channel out of its revenue generation team and plans to put greater emphasis on activity such as trolley stickers and window banners.

The original intention was for Tesco TV to divert revenue from TV advertising. But its sales house, JCDecaux, was forced to slash its rate card by 30% in early 2005 following poor take-up.

Major advertisers are understood to be unhappy about the network and have cited the placement and intrusive nature of screens as problems to be addressed.
Language like "according to insiders" and "advertisers are understood to be unhappy" indicates (to me, at least) that some hearsay and speculation may have been mixed in with the factual information gleaned during the research phase of this article.  (Perhaps a few advertisers had unrealistic expectations fueled by an overzealous sales team and strongly voiced their concerns, overshadowing others who might be pleased with the results.)  That, and a Tesco spokesperson indicated that the channel was under internal review, but didn't outright suggest that they were disappointed to the point of pulling the plug on the whole project.  Still, there has been too much gossip to ignore the situation entirely.

So what could the problem be?  To me, the key is in the last sentence of the quote above.  The "placement and intrusive nature of the screens" is something that can have quite a strong effect on not just the overall performance of the network, but also how it is perceived by shoppers.  I'm sure that Tesco analyzed their store traffic patterns when deciding where to place their digital signs, but traffic patterns can only tell you so much.  They might give you an idea of where shoppers tend to walk and where they frequently linger, but they won't tell you which direction they tend to look (you can speculate to some degree, of course), or what other visual clutter is in the area.  Maybe the screen placement interfered with the shopper's march through the store or their ability to search for products.  It's also possible that there are simply too many screens in place and the overall effect is more harassment than promotion.  After all, Tesco TV's 40+ screens per store is quite a bit more than most retail media networks employ.

Or perhaps the content running on these screens is to blame for the network's allegedly poor performance.  Bright colors and blinking messages might be attention-grabbing, but it can also grate the nerves after a while.  JCDecaux's own content guidelines recommend creating spots that are 10 seconds long, with sound.  The cacophony of multiple screens running different clips combined with the rapid visual changes of several 10 second ads swapping out might have overwhelmed some customers.

Fortunately, if the above items do turn out to be the problem, they can certainly be addressed.  I'd be willing to bet that the screens could be moved, rotated, raised, lowered or otherwise adjusted into less obtrusive spots while still retaining their visual impact, and a focus group could probably help the stores make the right choices there.  With regard to content, there are virtually limitless ways to make attractive, eye-catching segments that soothe and suggest, not chafe and coerce.

As the aforementioned Tesco spokesperson said, Tesco TV "is a relatively new product still in development," so the company acknowledges that there is room for improvement.  Hopefully Tesco and JCDecaux will put this high on their to-do list for 2006.  And when they do solve their problems, I'd love to see a case study outlining what the culprit(s) were, and what the ultimate solution turned out to be.  Keeping screens friendly and unobtrusive while still retaining their visual impact is no small task.  This would be a great opportunity for these two companies to come out with some "best practices" for digital signage advertising that our industry could adopt in general.

The Brand Republic article also underscores another important point: retail environments are diverse and dynamic, and even the best-planned networks will face unforseen challenges.  As much as I'd like it to be true, new in-store marketing initiatives don't achieve 100% success, especially not right from the get-go. It would just be naïve to believe otherwise.  So, hopefully Tesco TV will take the initial challenges in stride, run some good, solid experiments, find out what needs to be changed, and emerge all the wiser once said changes are in place and their digital signs are meeting or beating their expectations.

Comments (2)

Subscribe to comments for this article | Trackback

2008-01-17Shyam Venkatraman writes:
It is not surprising that Tesco TV is facing challenges. In economies such as China, where noise, bright colors are accepted better than in UK, the use of sound in shops and buses has raised protests.

The second aspect that I find surprising is depending only on Instore Products (my understanding could be wrong here) advertisements.

Companies such as Q-Vision in Sweden (q-vision.se) have generated revenues for shops through the Check out line advertising to support instore promotion.

An hybrid model (revenue generation through advertising for external offers and POS advertising) would probably work much better for Tesco without sound.
2008-01-17Bill Gerba writes:
Hi Shyam,

This article was published all the way back in 2006. In 2007, Tesco dropped JC Decaux in favor of Dunnhumby, a retail marketing specialist.

The network has been re-branded Tesco Screens, utilizes a completely new format, and is apparently quite successful now. You can read more about that conversion here

Leave a Comment

Name:
Email Address:
(required but won't be shown)

Website:
Comment:
(max 2000 characters)
Are you a human? If so, uncheck this box:



Digg this! | Del.icio.us


Previous Article: Using ongoing marketing and training to make your digital retailing program successful in 2006
Next Article: Analyzing Digital Signage Pilots - The Grocery Store

Front page of Digital Signage Insider Blog

LEGAL STUFF: The Digital Signage Insider is written by multiple authors. The author of each article is clearly identified at the start of the article. The opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official opinions of WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All articles are copyright © 2004-2009 by their respective author. All content besides the actual article text, e.g. surrounding branding and informational content, is copyright © 2000-2009 WireSpring Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as provided in WireSpring's Republishing and Syndication Policy, no articles may be reproduced, in whole or in part, without WireSpring's express written consent.

Subscribe to our RSS feed


  Subscribe via XML/RSS/RDF

About this blog and our team
WireSpring provides hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects. But this blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and we post new articles several times a week.

The blog team:

Our blog team includes some of the industry's most well-respected leaders:

Founder and Senior Writer:
Bill Gerba

Editor:
Jeremy Zaretzky

Writers:
Gary Halpin, Agency 225
Pat Hellberg, Kaicon
Hercules Huggins, WireSpring
Dr. Alice Julier, University of Pittsburgh
Darren Kubel, WireSpring
Christie Liu, Strategy Institute
Graeme Spicer, Adcentricity
Axel Vera, Infusion Marketing
Roberto Vogliolo, Artexe

If you would like a member of our blog team to provide feedback for a story you're working on, or you want them to speak at your event, please contact us.

Editorial policy:

Article topics are selected by our writers and editors, with the goal of providing objective and useful information to the entire digital signage industry. This means covering a lot of projects that have nothing to do with WireSpring's products, and we're fine with that. Whenever we mention a project that WireSpring is directly involved in, we'll be sure to provide appropriate disclosure in the text. If you'd like to suggest a topic for a future article, feel free to leave a comment or contact us. We don't take very kindly to PR spam, so please review our past articles before contacting us to verify that what you're planning to send is a good fit for our audience.